4.5 Article

Genome-wide identification and transcriptome-based expression pattern of chemosensory genes in two wild silkmoths, Antheraea pernyi and Antheraea yamamai

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECTS AS FOOD AND FEED
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 823-840

Publisher

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2022.0160

Keywords

Saturniidae; antennae; olfactory genes; gene family

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, candidate chemosensory genes were characterized from the genomes of two wild silkmoths. The study found that the number of genes related to olfaction and taste varied between the two species. Furthermore, most of these genes were expressed in the antennal transcriptome, while some gustatory receptor genes showed no expression.
Antheraea pernyi Guerin-Meneville and Antheraea yamamai Guerin-Meneville are two closely related wild silkmoths belonging to the family Saturniidae with highly edible and silk-producing value. In this study, we characterised candidate chemosensory genes from the genomes of the two silkmoths. In A. pernyi, 38 odorant-binding proteins (OBPs), 21 chemosensory proteins (CSPs), 3 sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs), 28 ionotropic receptors (IRs), 54 odorant receptors (ORs) and 53 gustatory receptors (GRs) were identified. In A. yamamai, 36 OBPs, 21 CSPs, 3 SNMPs, 30 IRs, 50 ORs and 54 GRs were identified. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the OBP, OR and GR genes were significantly expanded or contracted in the two silkmoths when compared to lepidopteran model Bombyx mori L., while the CSP genes were only expanded. The SNMP and IR genes were greatly conserved in the two silkmoths and B. mori. Most OBP, CSP, SNMP, IR and OR genes had the expression in the antennal transcriptome, but most GR genes showed no expression. This is the first study to characterise chemosensory genes of Saturniidae species in the genome and antennal transcriptome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available