4.7 Article

Ecotoxicological Assessment of Glitter Leachates in Aquatic Ecosystems: An Integrated Approach

Journal

TOXICS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10110677

Keywords

battery of bioassays; freshwater; saltwater; microplastics; chemical risk; integrated approach; Allivibrio fischeri; algae; Daphnia magna; Paracentrotus lividus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most ignored category of microplastics pollution is glitter. Glitter leachate of nine types were tested for toxicity on model organisms in freshwater and saltwater. The results showed that photosynthesizing primary producers were the most sensitive, with higher sensitivity in marine environments.
The most worrisome fraction within plastic pollution is that of microplastics (MP). A category of MP almost completely ignored is that of glitter. The objective of this study is to test the toxicity of nine types of glitter leachate (3 soak times: 3, 90 and 180 days) on model organisms in freshwater (Allivibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Daphnia magna) and saltwater (Allivibrio fischeri, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Paracentrotus lividus). An integrated approach was applied to obtain the percentage of ecotoxicological risk. The results show that (i) photosynthesizing primary producers are the most sensitive trophic level; (ii) algae transitioned from growth inhibition to biostimulation; (iii) D. magna showed higher sensitivity after 48 h compared to 24 h; (iv) A. fischeri responded more strongly in saltwater than in freshwater. The integrated data show a greater risk associated with the marine environment, with the highest risk for glitters that are hexagonal and composed of poly-methyl-methacrylate. Our multivariate analysis shows that the toxicity of plastic leaching is a complex phenomenon that depends on the sensitivity of the species, in some cases on the soaking time and on the medium, and is not clearly linked to the polymer type, the contact area or the colors of the particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available