4.7 Article

Nonlinear Associations between Blood Cadmium Concentration and Thyroid Hormones According to Smoking Status in Korean Adults: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES)

Journal

TOXICS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics11020129

Keywords

blood cadmium; thyroid hormones; smoking status; restricted cubic splines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the association between blood cadmium (BCd) exposure and thyroid hormone levels in Korean adults. The results showed nonlinear associations between BCd and free thyroxine in smokers, but no significant associations were found in men or women. The study provides empirical support for establishing an acceptable concentration range of BCd and introduces a new concept for preventing thyroid problems.
Research on the association between blood cadmium (BCd) exposure and thyroid hormone levels in the general population has been inconclusive. Therefore, we examined the associations between BCd and thyroid hormones according to smoking status in Korean adults (N = 1170, Men = 722, Women = 448) using multiple linear regression and restricted cubic splines analysis with data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013). The geometric mean of BCd was 0.74 mu g/L in all study participants and was higher in smokers (1.01 mu g/L) than in nonsmokers (0.65 mu g/L). Restricted cubic splines analysis revealed nonlinear trends between BCd and free thyroxine in smokers (p for nonlinearity = 0.02). By contrast, there were no significant associations between BCd and thyroid hormones in either men or women. In conclusion, nonlinear associations may exist between BCd and free thyroxine in smokers. Our study provides empirical support for the future formulation of an acceptable concentration range of BCd and offers a new concept for preventing thyroid problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available