Digital marketing of formula and baby food negatively influences breast feeding and complementary feeding: a cross-sectional study and video recording of parental exposure in Mexico

BackgroundThere is little evidence of the association between digital marketing of formula and baby food and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices. ObjectiveAssess parents' exposure to digital marketing of formula and baby food for children MethodsParents >= 18 years recruited from a market research panel completed an online survey (n=1074) and capture-on-screen (n=95) between December 2020 and January 2021. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the association between exposure to digital marketing of formula and baby foods with its purchase, motivation, consumption and IYCF practices. ResultsDigital marketing of formula and baby food was self-reported by 93.9% of parents in the online survey and observed by 93.7% in the capture-on-screen. Recorded ads did not comply with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. Parents who self-reported seeing a higher versus lower number of ads were less likely to exclusive breast feed (OR=0.38; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.78), and more likely to give mixed feeding (OR=2.59; 95% CI: 1.28 to 5.21), formula (OR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.53), processed foods (OR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.59 to 3.32) and sugary drinks (OR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.54). Higher exposure to ads was associated with a higher chance of purchasing products motivated by nutritional (OR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.28) and organic claims (OR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.72). ConclusionsDigital marketing of formula and baby food may negatively influence IYCF and should be regulated to ensure children's nutrition and health.

Automated summary

This study examined the association between digital marketing of formula and baby food and infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices. The results demonstrated that digital marketing can negatively influence IYCF and should be regulated to ensure children's nutrition and health.