4.7 Article

Environmental, economical, and machinability based sustainability assessment in hybrid machining process employing tool textures and solid lubricant

Journal

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00511

Keywords

Sustainability; Tool texture; Solid lubricant; Tool life; Cutting forces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different techniques can be employed to improve the sustainability and machinability characteristics of a machining process, with tool textures and solid lubricants being popular methods. Sustainability assessment involves analyzing various factors such as energy consumption, cost, and production rate. Tool textures and solid lubricants have shown improvements in energy consumption, carbon emissions, cost, and production rate, leading to the selection of linear textures in dry conditions as the best sustainable machining operation.
Different techniques can be employed to improve the sustainability and machinability characteristics of a machining process. The sustainability assessment analyzes different aspects and indicators of an operation, including environment (energy consumption and carbon emission), economy (cost and production rate), and social (operator health and safety). The comparison of machining techniques based on sustainability assessment requires quantitative evaluation of indicators and sustainability index (SI) based on machining characteristics. Current research employs two main techniques of tool textures (on dual tool faces) and solid lubricant during the external grooving operation to make a sustainable hybrid process. Tool textures include pit-shape and linear patterns fabricated on rake and clearance faces. Results showed that in the case of energy consumption, the linear textured tool with solid lubricant consumed the minimum value by about 10.7 kJ. In the case of carbon emission, linear textured tool in dry machining conditions emitted about 0.008 kg-CO2 which was the minimum value. In the case of cost, a linear textured tool in dry machining conditions required 0.118 $ which was the cheapest process. In the case of production rate, the linear textured tool with solid lubricant presented the highest production rate by about 1773 parts/shift. On average, textures achieved about 23 higher SI values whereas solid lubricant reduced SI by about 13. Finally, linear texture in the dry condition achieved the most considerable value of the SI (52.5) and was selected as the best sustainable machining operation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available