☆ 4.7 Article

Which Is Better in Clinical and Radiological Outcomes for Lumbar Degenerative Disease of Two Segments: MIS-TLIF or OPEN-TLIF?

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE (2022)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Clinical Neurology

Perioperative Modifications to the Open TLIF Provide Comparable Short-term Outcomes to the MIS-TLIF

Richard A. Berkman et al.

Summary: This retrospective review compared short-term outcomes of modified Open TLIF with tubular MIN-TLIF, showing favorable results in terms of avoidance of blood transfusions, shorter hospital stays, and less opioid usage while maintaining satisfactory patient-reported outcomes.

CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY (2022)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yi-No Kang et al.

Summary: This study compared different fusion techniques in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis and found that circumferential fusion had the best balance between fusion rate and overall adverse events. PLF was still considered an inferior procedure.

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) influence functional outcomes and spinopelvic parameters in isthmic spondylolisthesis?

Elsayed Mohamed Selim Ali et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. The results showed that MIS-TLIF significantly improved clinical symptoms and radiological outcomes, while correcting and maintaining proper spinopelvic alignment.

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

A Comparative Study of a New Retractor-Assisted WILTSE TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and Traditional PLIF for Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Huanan Liu et al.

Summary: Comparing the clinical efficacy of a new retractor-assisted Wiltse TLIF, minimally invasive TLIF, and traditional PLIF, it was found that the new retractor-assisted Wiltse TLIF is a more convenient and minimally invasive surgical method, which can reduce intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and bedridden time, while traditional PLIF has higher back pain VAS scores, lower ODI and JOA scores.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Meng Ge et al.

Summary: This study compared hidden blood loss (HBL), visible blood loss (VBL), and total blood loss (TBL) following Endo-TLIF and Mis-TLIF and evaluated the clinical significance of these procedures. The results showed that Endo-TLIF significantly reduced HBL, VBL, and TBL compared to Mis-TLIF and had better short-term clinical outcomes. However, there were no significant differences in long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and peri-operative complications between the two groups.

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries

Hitesh N. Modi et al.

Summary: This study compared clinical and radiological parameters between MIS-TLIF and open TLIF, finding similar outcomes in clinical scores, surgical effects, and complications, with less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay associated with MIS-TLIF.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Orthopedics

Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: A systematic review of 15 studies

Shahswar Arif et al.

Summary: This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of navigation assisted fluoroscopy methods in minimizing radiation exposure to surgeons during minimally invasive spine surgeries. The results showed that modified navigation techniques can significantly reduce operation time, fluoroscopic time, and effective radiation dose compared to conventional methods. However, future randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen the evidence of their efficacy in reducing radiation-related hazards, as the lack of statistical significance was noted.

ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ruud Droeghaag et al.

Summary: This study conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of OTLIF compared to MITLIF in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative disease. The results indicated that MITLIF is more cost-effective than OTLIF. Considering the rising costs of instrumented spine surgery, cost-effectiveness could play a crucial role in surgical decision-making.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Alice Venier et al.

Summary: The study provided data on minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with navigation coupled with mobile intraoperative computed tomography, showing reduced radiation exposure, high accuracy, and decreased surgical time with increasing experience.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Impact of Obesity on Complication Rates, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Lukas Goertz et al.

Summary: In obese patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), outcomes and complication rates were comparable to nonobese patients. Despite worse postoperative physical component SF-36 scores, obese patients achieved similar improvements in pain intensity and functional status, suggesting obesity should not be a contraindication for MIS-TLIF surgery in patients with appropriate indications.

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review

Inge J. M. H. Caelers et al.

Summary: The demand for spinal fusion surgery has increased over the years. TLIF and PLIF are two widely used techniques for spinal fusion, with TLIF potentially being more cost-effective due to lower costs and similar effectiveness in back and leg pain relief. However, the quality of studies comparing these techniques is generally low and more high-quality comparative studies are needed to determine the preferable technique.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

MIS-TLIF versus O-TLIF for single-level degenerative stenosis: study protocol for randomised controlled trial

Olga N. Leonova et al.

Summary: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes, safety, radiological parameters, and cost-effectiveness between minimally invasive and traditional open decompression and fusion for patients with symptomatic single-level combination of degenerative stenosis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at national and international congresses.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation

Zhi Zhou et al.

Summary: The study discussed a new surgical strategy that combines percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for two-level disc herniation at L4/5 and L5/S1, showing satisfactory efficacy in treating patients.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Risk Factors Related to Superior Facet Joint Violation During Lumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF)

Yiwei Zhao et al.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF 2-Year Follow-up

Nathaniel W. Jenkins et al.

SPINE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Minimally invasive versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Rongqing Qin et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

O-arm Navigation Combined With Microscope-assisted MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Kangwu Chen et al.

CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jun Hao Tan et al.

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Instrumented Minimally Invasive Spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

Jin-Sung Kim et al.

CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Orthopedics

Comparative Prospective Study Reporting Intraoperative Parameters, Pedicle Screw Perforation, and Radiation Exposure in Navigation-Guided versus Non-navigated Fluoroscopy-Assisted Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Tarun Dusad et al.

ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Surgery

Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in 1-segment lumbar disc herniation

You Lv et al.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Clinical Neurology

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Suzanne L. de Kunder et al.

SPINE JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis

Lei Xie et al.

CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally invasive TLIF leads to increased muscle sparing of the multifidus muscle but not the longissimus muscle compared with conventional PLIF-a prospective randomized clinical trial

Michael Putzier et al.

SPINE JOURNAL (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Learning Curve of a Complex Surgical Technique Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS TLIF)

Kong Hwee Lee et al.

JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery

Moo Sung Kang et al.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Clinical Neurology

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement

G Rao et al.

SPINE (2003)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.