4.7 Article

Comparison of Glucose Lowering Efficacy of Human GLP-1 Agonist in Taiwan Type 2 Diabetes Patients after Switching from DPP-4 Inhibitor Use or Non-Use

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111915

Keywords

GLP-1 agonist; DPP-4 inhibitor; type 2 diabetes mellitus; Taiwan

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  2. [CFRPG8H0121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy of glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients who switched from DPP-4 inhibitors to GLP-1 receptor agonists. The results showed that there was a significant reduction in HbA1c levels after initiating GLP-1 RAs in both DPP-4 inhibitor users and non-users. Non-users of DPP-4 inhibitors had a greater reduction in HbA1c levels compared to users, indicating better glucose control.
To determine the efficacy of glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients who switch from dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors use or non-use to GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). We conducted a cohort study using data from the Chang Gung Research Database. Patients aged >= 18 years using newly initiated GLP-1 RAs between 1 January 2009, and 31 December 2016, were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for treatment selection bias. The primary outcome was changes in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. The HbA1c level fell substantially after initiating GLP-1 RAs in DPP-4 inhibitor users and nonusers. A mean HbA1c reduction of -0.42% was found in patients who received DPP-4 inhibitors. Those who were DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers had a reduction in HbA1c of -0.99%. The degree of reduction in HbA1c was significantly greater in patients who were DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers (p value < 0.01), compared to the DPP-4 inhibitor users. In routine care, DPP-4 inhibitor nonusers had better efficacy in glucose control than DPP-4 inhibitor users after switching to a GLP-1 agonist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available