4.7 Article

Constructing coarse-grained skyrmion potentials from experimental data with Iterative Boltzmann Inversion

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-023-01145-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to understand skyrmion behaviour often overlook the interaction potentials but these are key to improve predictive modelling. Here, the authors use an Iterative Boltzmann Inversion technique to construct potentials for skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-boundary interactions from a single experimental measurement, finding the two interactions are exponentially repulsive.
Efforts to understand skyrmion behaviour often overlook the interaction potentials but these are key to improve predictive modelling. Here, the authors use an Iterative Boltzmann Inversion technique to construct potentials for skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-boundary interactions from a single experimental measurement, finding the two interactions are exponentially repulsive. In an effort to understand skyrmion behavior on a coarse-grained level, skyrmions are often described as 2D quasiparticles evolving according to the Thiele equation. Interaction potentials are the key missing parameters for predictive modeling of experiments. Here, the Iterative Boltzmann Inversion technique commonly used in soft matter simulations is applied to construct potentials for skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-magnetic material boundary interactions from a single experimental measurement without any prior assumptions of the potential form. It is found that the two interactions are purely repulsive and can be described by an exponential function for micrometer-sized skyrmions in a ferromagnetic thin film multilayer stack. This captures the physics on experimental length and time scales that are of interest for most skyrmion applications and typically inaccessible to atomistic or micromagnetic simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available