4.7 Article

Therapy Defining at Initial Diagnosis of Primary Brain Tumor-The Role of 18F-FET PET/CT and MRI

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010128

Keywords

primary malignant brain tumors; glioblastoma; amino acid tracers; F-18-FET PET; CT; non enhancing tumors; MRI; perfusion weighted MRI; drug treatment; neurological disorder

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amino acid PET/CT outperforms enhanced MRI in sensitivity and negative predictive value for the primary diagnosis of primary malignant brain tumors, but is inferior in terms of specificity.
Primary malignant brain tumors are heterogeneous and infrequent neoplasms. Their classification, therapeutic regimen and prognosis have undergone significant development requiring the innovation of an imaging diagnostic. The performance of enhanced magnetic resonance imaging depends on blood-brain barrier function. Several studies have demonstrated the advantages of static and dynamic amino acid PET/CT providing accurate metabolic status in the neurooncological setting. The aim of our single-center retrospective study was to test the primary diagnostic role of amino acid PET/CT compared to enhanced MRI. Emphasis was placed on cases prior to intervention, therefore, a certain natural bias was inevitable. In our analysis for newly found brain tumors F-18-FET PET/CT outperformed contrast MRI and PWI in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value (100% vs. 52.9% and 36.36%; 100% vs. 38.46% and 41.67%), in terms of positive predictive value their performance was roughly the same (84.21 % vs. 90% and 100%), whereas regarding specificity contrast MRI and PWI were superior (40% vs. 83.33% and 100%). Based on these results the superiority of F-18-FET PET/CT seems to present incremental value during the initial diagnosis. In the case of non-enhancing tumors, it should always be suggested as a therapy-determining test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available