4.7 Article

A novel dual-nozzle 3D printing method for continuous fiber reinforced composite cellular structures

Journal

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101448

Keywords

Dual-nozzle 3D printing; Continuous fiber; Composite cellular structure; Rapid manufacturing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a novel dual-nozzle 3D printing method for manufacturing continuous fiber reinforced composite cellular structures (CFRSs). By introducing dual-nozzle modules and corresponding printing paths, the manufacturing speed could be theoretically increased by two times. A typical rhombus filled cellular structure was fabricated using this method. Mechanical tests showed that CFRSs printed using single and dual-nozzle approaches had similar properties, with a difference within 6.0%. Additionally, this multi-nozzle printing technique allowed for the fabrication of complex structures with desired properties, such as multicellular and hybrid fiber structures.
This work reported a novel dual-nozzle 3D printing method for continuous fiber reinforced composite cellular structures (CFRSs). The dual-nozzle modules and corresponded printing paths were proposed to realize the CFRSs by theoretically increasing two times manufacturing speed. Based on this novel dual-nozzle 3D printing method, typical rhombus filled cellular structure was prepared. The tensile and compressive tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of CFRSs formed by dual-nozzle 3D printing. The results showed that the CFRSs printed with single-and dual-nozzle approaches exhibited similar mechanical properties, and the dif-ference was within 6.0%. Last, the proposed multi-nozzle printing technique opened the design window to fabricate complex structures such as multicellular and hybrid fiber structures with desired properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available