4.7 Article

Gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of flutriafol residues in food

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 955-963

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2qm01231f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel hapten was designed to produce a highly sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody for the detection of flutriafol (FTF) residues in crops. Additionally, a gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) was developed for the quantitative detection of FTF in rice, tomatoes, and grapes, with a visual limit of detection of 0.5 mg kg(-1), 0.2 mg kg(-1) and 0.5 mg kg(-1), respectively. The recoveries in spiked samples ranged from 90.2% to 110.1%, indicating the reliability of this LFIA as an on-site detection method.
As a commonly used crop fungicide with proven adverse effects against various organisms, the excessive use of flutriafol (FTF) has resulted in accumulation of a large amount of residues in crops. In this study, a novel hapten was designed by introducing a long interval arm on its benzene ring allowing sufficient exposure of the FTF active site, for the production of a highly sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody with a half-inhibitory concentration of 1.77 ng mL(-1). Furthermore, for the first time, a gold nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) was developed for the quantitative detection of FTF in foods with a visual limit of detection in rice, tomatoes, and grapes of 0.5 mg kg(-1), 0.2 mg kg(-1) and 0.5 mg kg(-1), respectively, and a cutoff value of 4 mg kg(-1), and a calculated limit of detection of 0.045 mg kg(-1), 0.035 mg kg(-1) and 0.060 mg kg(-1), respectively. The recoveries in spiked samples ranged from 90.2% to 110.1% and these results indicated that the gold nanoparticle-based LFIA developed in this study for the rapid detection of FTF in food is a reliable on-site detection method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available