4.7 Article

Process Insights into Perovskite Thin-Film Photovoltaics from Machine Learning with In Situ Luminescence Data

Journal

SOLAR RRL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202201114

Keywords

clustering; datasets; in situ characterization; machine learning; performance prediction; perovskite solar cells; process monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-area processing is a challenge for perovskite solar cells. Machine learning methods offer potential for scalable fabrication and performance prediction through the analysis of labeled datasets.
Large-area processing remains a key challenge for perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Advanced understanding and improved reproducibility of scalable fabrication processes are required to unlock the technology's economic potential. In this regard, machine learning (ML) methods have emerged as a promising tool to accelerate research and unlock the control needed to produce large-area solution-processed perovskite thin films. However, a suitable dataset allowing the analysis of a scalable fabrication process is currently missing. Herein, a unique labeled in situ photoluminescence (PL) dataset for blade-coated PSCs is introduced and explored with unsupervised k-means clustering, demonstrating the feasibility to derive meaningful insights from such data. Correlations between the obtained clusters and the measured performance of PSC reveal that the in situ PL signal encodes information about the perovskite thin-film quality. Detrimental mechanisms during thin-film formation are detected by identifying spatial differences in PL patterns and, consequently, of device performance. In addition, k-nearest neighbors is applied to predict the performance of PSCs, motivating further investigations into ML-based in-line process monitoring of scalable PSC fabrication to detect, understand, and ultimately minimize process variations across iterations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available