4.3 Article

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Adenomas/Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical Practices, Controversies, and Perspectives

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 1111-1118

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-022-2673-6

Keywords

WHO pathological classification; pituitary adenoma; PitNET; tumor classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The latest edition of the WHO classification of the central nervous system, published in 2021, has made major revisions to the classification of anterior pituitary tumors. The most significant revision involves preferring the terminology of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) over pituitary adenoma (PA). Immunohistochemistry examination of pituitary-specific transcription factors is recommended to determine the tumor cell lineage. However, the application of this new classification system still needs further evaluation and validation due to technological limitations and a limited understanding of tumor pathogenesis.
The latest edition of the WHO classification of the central nervous system was published in 2021. This review summarizes the major revisions to the classification of anterior pituitary tumors. The most important revision involves preferring the terminology of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), even though the terminology of pituitary adenoma (PA) still can be used according to this WHO classification compared to the previous one. Moreover, immunohistochemistry (IHC) examination of pituitary-specific transcription factors (TFs), including PIT1, TPIT, SF-1, GATA2/3, and ERa, is endorsed to determine the tumor cell lineage and to facilitate the classification of PitNET/PA subgroups. However, TF- negative IHC staining indicates PitNET/PA with no distinct cell lineages, which includes unclassified plurihormonal (PH) tumors and null cell (NC) tumors in this edition. The new WHO classification of PitNET/PA has incorporated tremendous advances in the understanding of the cytogenesis and pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. However, due to the shortcomings of the technology used in the diagnosis of PitNET/PA and the limited understanding of the tumorigenesis of PitNET/PA, the application of this new classification system in practice should be further evaluated and validated. Besides providing information for deciding the followup plans and adjunctive treatment after surgery, this classification system offers no additional help for neurosurgeons in clinical practice, especially in determining the treatment strategies. Therefore, it is necessary for neurosurgeons to establish a comprehensive pituitary classification system for PitNET/PA that incorporates neuroimaging grading data or direct observation of invasiveness during operation or the predictor of prognosis, as well as pathological diagnosis, thereby distinguishing the invasiveness of the tumor and facilitating neurosurgeons to decide on the treatment strategies and follow-up plans as well as adjunctive treatment after surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available