4.6 Article

Simplified analytical model for tapered sandwich beams using variable stiffness materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 3-25

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1099636215619775

Keywords

Variable stiffness; sandwich beams; axially graded core; Ritz method; nonlinear model

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Advanced Composites for Innovation and Science [EP/G036772/1]
  2. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simplified layer-wise sandwich beam model to capture the effects of a combination of geometric taper and variable stiffness of the core on the static response of a sandwich beam is developed. In the present model, the face sheets are assumed to behave as Euler beams and the core is modelled with a first-order shear deformation theory. With geometrical compatibility enforced at both upper and lower skin/core interfaces, the beam's field functions are reduced to only three, namely the extensional, transverse and rotational displacements at the mid-plane of the core. The minimum total potential energy method is used in combination with the Ritz technique to obtain an approximate solution. Geometrically nonlinear effects are considered in the present formulation by introducing von Karman strains into the face sheets and core. Two types of sandwich beams, uniform and tapered, with different boundary conditions are studied. Results show that the proposed model provides accurate prediction of displacements and stresses, compared to three-dimensional finite element analysis. It is found that due to the axial stiffness variation in the core, displacements of beams and stresses of face sheets and core are significantly affected. The potential design space is shown to be expanded by utilizing variable stiffness materials in sandwich constructions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available