4.7 Review

A Review of Ship-to-Ship Interactions in Calm Waters

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10121856

Keywords

ship-to-ship interaction; experimental model interactions; overtaking manoeuvres; head-to-head encounters; lightering operations; RANS solver

Funding

  1. European Union [856887]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hydrodynamic interaction between ships in harbours or inland waterways is a classical research area. Numerical simulation has become the most widely adopted method to investigate this problem.
The hydrodynamic interaction between two or more ships in harbours or inland waterways is a classical maritime engineering research area. In ship manoeuvring practice, ship masters try to determine the speed and gap limit when a ship is passing or encountering others, particularly in confined water ways. This requires an accurate prediction of the interaction force acting on both ships. The pioneer experimental studies showed that the interaction could lead to a very large yaw moment and this moment is strongly time-dependent, which could make the ships veer from their original courses, leading to collisions. Based on the findings on experimental measurements, some empirical formulas are proposed in the literature to predict such interaction forces. However, these formulas could provide a satisfactory estimation only when the ship speed is quite high, and the water depth is shallow and constant. Numerical simulation overcomes this issue by simulating the ship-to-ship problem by considering the effect of the 3D ship hull, variable water depth and ship speed. Numerical simulation has now become the most widely adopted method to investigate the ship-to-ship problem. In the present study, the development of the methodologies of ship-to-ship problems will be reviewed, and the research gap and challenges will be summarized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available