4.8 Article

Crosstalk between Gut Microbiota and Dietary Lipids Aggravates WAT Inflammation through TLR Signaling

Journal

CELL METABOLISM
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 658-668

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  3. Swedish Diabetes Foundation
  4. Swedish Heart Lung Foundation
  5. Torsten Soderbergs Foundation
  6. Ragnar Soderbergs Foundation
  7. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  8. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  9. TORNADO [FP7-KBBE-222720]
  10. EU [FP7-KBBE-222639]
  11. LUA-ALF grant from Vastra Gotalandsregionen
  12. European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator grant [615362 - METABASE]
  13. FRFS-WELBIO [WELBIO-CR-2012S-02R]
  14. ERC [336452-ENIGMO]
  15. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0008163] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dietary lipids may influence the abundance of circulating inflammatory microbial factors. Hence, inflammation in white adipose tissue (WAT) induced by dietary lipids may be partly dependent on their interaction with the gut microbiota. Here, we show that mice fed lard for 11 weeks have increased Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation and WAT inflammation and reduced insulin sensitivity compared with mice fed fish oil and that phenotypic differences between the dietary groups can be partly attributed to differences in microbiota composition. Trif(-/-) and Myd88(-/-) mice are protected against lard-induced WAT inflammation and impaired insulin sensitivity. Experiments in germ-free mice show that an interaction between gut microbiota and saturated lipids promotes WAT inflammation independent of adiposity. Finally, we demonstrate that the chemokine CCL2 contributes to microbiota-induced WAT inflammation in lard-fed mice. These results indicate that gut microbiota exacerbates metabolic inflammation through TLR signaling upon challenge with a diet rich in saturated lipids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available