4.6 Review

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Germany

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112816

Keywords

first trimester-screening (FTS); teratogen effects; multigenetic diseases; pregnant woman perspective; false-positive; false-negative; knowledge of specialists and public

Funding

  1. Committee of the Republic of Armenia
  2. [21AG-1F068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the short 10 years since its introduction, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a widely adopted standard screening test in many countries, including Germany. However, a review of the international literature reveals that NIPT also comes with certain issues and challenges. The German Gene Diagnostics Act (GenDG) addresses some of these issues, but also introduces new problems. It is crucial to provide appropriate training for physicians offering NIPT counseling and to ensure the provision of comprehensive and balanced information for pregnant women or couples.
In the short 10 years following the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), it has been adapted in many countries around the world as a standard screening test. In this review, this development was analyzed with a special focus on Germany. As a result, it can be stated that all known advantages of NIPT apart from compensating for having no access to centers offering invasive diagnostics are valid for Germany. In addition, following a review of the international literature, all documented issues with NIPT are also observed in Germany. However, the German Gene Diagnostics Act (GenDG) addresses a number of these issues, for example, the regulations by GenDG hamper induced abortions, based exclusively on an abnormal NIPT result. At the same time, GenDG has created new problems, as a possible collusion between the right not to know with regard to parts of the examination result may occur, or that the sex of the fetus must not be reported to the pregnant woman before the 12th week of gestation. Main conclusions drawn are that appropriate training and the continuing education of the physicians providing NIPT-related counseling are needed, as well as the provision of balanced and comprehensive information for the pregnant woman or the couple that is imperative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available