4.7 Article

Ultrasonic Disintegration to Improve Anaerobic Digestion of Microalgae with Hard Cell Walls-Scenedesmus sp. and Pinnularia sp.

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12010053

Keywords

microalgae biomass; anaerobic digestion; ultrasound disintegration; biogas; methane; cell wall; pretreatment; biofuels

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effect of ultrasonic disintegration on the performance and energy efficiency of anaerobic digestion of Scenedesmus sp. and Pinnularia sp. microalgal biomass. The pretreatment significantly increased dissolved COD and TOC in the system. The highest CH4 yields were achieved for Scenedesmus sp. sonicated for 150 s and 200 s, while Pinnularia sp. exhibited poorer performance compared to non-pretreated biomass.
Microalgae are considered to be very promising feedstocks for biomethane production. It has been shown that the structure of microalgal cell walls can be highly detrimental to the anaerobic digestibility of biomass. Therefore, there is a real need to seek ways to eliminate this problem. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of ultrasonic disintegration of Scenedesmus sp. and Pinnularia sp. microalgal biomass on the performance and energy efficiency of anaerobic digestion. The pretreatment was successful in significantly increasing dissolved COD and TOC in the system. The highest CH4 yields were noted for Scenedesmus sp. sonicated for 150 s and 200 s, which produced 309 +/- 13 cm(3)/gVS and 313 +/- 15 cm(3)/gVS, respectively. The 50 s group performed the best in terms of net energy efficiency at 1.909 +/- 0.20 Wh/gVS. Considerably poorer performance was noted for Pinnularia sp., with biomass yields and net energy gains peaking at CH4 250 +/- 21 cm(3)/gVS and 0.943 +/- 0.22 Wh/gVS, respectively. Notably, the latter value was inferior to even the non-pretreated biomass (which generated 1.394 +/- 0.19 Wh/gVS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available