4.8 Article

Glycolysis-Mediated Changes in Acetyl-CoA and Histone Acetylation Control the Early Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells

Journal

CELL METABOLISM
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 392-402

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council Starting Grant TMIHCV [242699]
  2. Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant microLiverMaturation [248417]
  3. British Council BIRAX Regenerative Medicine award [33BX12HGYN]
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche GENOPAT [ANR-08-GENO-024]
  5. Tres grandes infrastructures de recherche [TGIR-RMN-THC CNRS FR3050]
  6. INSERM
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [242699] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of pluripotency is a gradual event whose initiating factors are largely unknown. Here we report the earliest metabolic changes induced during the first hours of differentiation. High-resolution NMR identified 44 metabolites and a distinct metabolic transition occurring during early differentiation. Metabolic and transcriptional analyses showed that pluripotent cells produced acetyl-CoA through glycolysis and rapidly lost this function during differentiation. Importantly, modulation of glycolysis blocked histone deacetylation and differentiation in human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Acetate, a precursor of acetylCoA, delayed differentiation and blocked early histone deacetylation in a dose-dependent manner. Inhibitors upstream of acetyl-CoA caused differentiation of pluripotent cells, while those downstream delayed differentiation. Our results show a metabolic switch causing a loss of histone acetylation and pluripotent state during the first hours of differentiation. Our data highlight the important role metabolism plays in pluripotency and suggest that a glycolytic switch controlling histone acetylation can release stem cells from pluripotency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available