4.5 Article

Survey on Sports-Related Concussions among Japanese University Students

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111557

Keywords

sports-related concussion; epidemiology; Japan

Categories

Funding

  1. Fukuoka University
  2. [206008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there has been increasing attention on head injuries in sports, especially international discussions on preventing and responding to sports-related concussions (SRCs). This study aims to investigate past experiences of SRCs among university students in Japan, examine the state and mechanism of such injuries in each sport, and consider the establishment of an environment for future prevention and responses to SRCs.
In recent years, head injuries in sports have garnered attention, and in particular, international discussions have been held on the prevention of and response to sports-related concussions (SRCs). The purpose of this study is to investigate past SRCs experienced by university students in Japan, clarify the state and mechanism of such injuries in each sport, and consider the creation of an environment for future SRC prevention and responses. A questionnaire survey on past SRC experience was conducted among 1731 students who belonged to Fukuoka University in Japan and took sports medicine classes in 2020. Responses from 1140 students (collection rate: 65.9%) were obtained. According to this survey, it was revealed that 39 students (3.7%) had experienced SRC. The male-female ratio of those who had experienced SRC was 31 males (79.5%) and 8 females (20.5%). Two males had experienced SRC twice. In this study, SRCs were recognized in a variety of sports, not just in a few contact sports. It is necessary to further disseminate education on head injury prevention and SRCs among both athletes and coaches, because SRCs have been frequently recognized in various sports.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available