4.5 Article

Hardware-Related Skin Erosion in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: How Far Can We Go? An Illustrative Case Report

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121715

Keywords

deep brain stimulation; skin erosion; hardware-related complications

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skin erosion is a common complication of deep brain stimulation (DBS), which can be managed conservatively or with invasive surgical techniques. In some cases, a flap can be used to cover the implant, but removal of the implant may still be necessary, leading to worsening of symptoms. The treatment of skin erosion requires careful consideration.
Skin erosion is a hardware-related complication commonly described after deep brain stimulation (DBS). Hardware exposure is often associated with the development of infection that can lead to implant removal. However, in selected cases, it is possible to manage skin erosion without having to remove the hardware. This article presents the case of a patient with recurrent skin erosions above the IPG, who underwent multiple surgeries. Given the failure of less invasive approaches, a more complex surgery with the employment of a pedunculated flap of pectoralis major in order to cover the IPG was attempted. Nevertheless, the IPG removal was finally unavoidable, resulting in a rapid decline in clinical performance. This illustrative case suggests how, in patients with sustained stimulation who benefit from a good degree of autonomy, it may be useful to use invasive surgical techniques to resolve skin erosions and save the DBS system. In spite of everything, sometimes complete or partial removal of the implant still becomes unavoidable, but this can lead to a severe worsening of PD symptoms. Definitive removal of the system should therefore be considered only in cases of frank infection or after failure of all other approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available