4.6 Article

What We Learn from Surveillance of Microbial Colonization in Recipients of Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12010002

Keywords

surveillance; microbial colonization; pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant; antibiotic resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial colonization surveillance does not provide significant benefits in pediatric HSCT recipients in terms of infection risk.
Infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remain one of the major causes for morbidity and mortality, and it is still unclear whether knowledge of microbial colonization is important. In this single-center study, we collected weekly surveillance cultures in pediatric recipients of allogenic HSCT from five different body regions and tested for bacteria and fungi. Between January 2010 and December 2021, we collected 1095 swabs from 57 recipients of allogeneic HSCTs (median age: 7.5 years, IQR 1-3: 2.5-11.9). The incidence of positive microbiological cultures (n = 220; 20.1%) differed according to the anatomic localization (p < 0.001) and was most frequent in the anal region (n = 98), followed by the genital, pharyngeal and nasal regions (n = 55, n = 37 and n = 16, respectively). Gram-positive bacteria (70.4%) were the most commonly isolated organisms, followed by fungi (18.6%), Gram-negative (5.5%), non-fermenting bacteria (1.4%), and other flora (4.1%). No association with increased risk of infection (n = 32) or septicemia (n = 7) was noted. Over time, we did not observe any increase in bacterial resistance. We conclude that there is no benefit to surveillance of microbial colonization by culture-based techniques in pediatric HSCT. Sequencing methods might enhance the detection of pathogens, but its role is still to be defined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available