4.7 Article

Identifying priority areas for tidal wetland restoration by integrating ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1019619

Keywords

tidal wetland; priority areas; ecological restoration; systematic conservation planning; reclaimed area; Shanghai; ecosystem service; supply and demand

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for Advanced Talents, Yangzhou University
  3. [42141016]
  4. [137012618]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the importance of considering the status of regional ecosystem services supply and demand in large-scale spatial planning for tidal wetland restoration. The authors developed a five-step workflow based on systematic conservation planning to identify priority areas for restoration and applied it to coastal reclaimed areas in Shanghai, China. The findings showed that the potential restorable areas accounted for only 31.4% of the original reclaimed area, and considering ecosystem services demand resulted in an increase in priority areas and a higher restoration cost.
Governments and non-governmental organizations have widely recognized tidal wetland restoration as a sustainable instrument to lessen the threat of climate change, which is reflected by the expansion of the spatial scale of coastal restoration projects. However, approaches to large-scale spatial planning of tidal wetland restoration remain sparse. Previous studies on site selection for restoration planning have focused on the potential supply of ecosystem services (ES) or restoration feasibility with less emphasis on the mitigation of the status of regional ES supply and demand mismatches. We developed a five-step workflow based on systematic conservation planning to identify priority areas for tidal wetland restoration and applied it to the coastal reclaimed areas of Shanghai, China. With this workflow, we analyzed the changes in spatial distribution and the potential ecosystem services supply and restoration costs of priority areas between the two different scenarios of ES demand ignored and ES demand considered. Results showed that the potential restorable areas only accounted for 31.4% (425.2 km(2)) of the original reclaimed area because of other land use demands (e.g., permanent basic farmland conservation). We extracted 50% of the potential restorable areas as priority areas based on Aichi Target 15. Compared with the ES demand-ignored scenario, the ES demand scenario resulted in a substantial increase in the priority areas of Baoshan District (similar to 177%) and Pudong New Area (similar to 15%) and a small decrease in Chongming District (similar to 4%). No significant change in the potential ES supply for all priority areas was observed between the two scenarios. However, the total restoration cost of the ES demand scenario is 10% higher than that of the ES demand-ignored scenario. Our study highlights the importance of considering the status of regional ES supply and demand (mis)matches in large-scale spatial planning for tidal wetland restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available