4.6 Review

Trimethylamine N-Oxide Levels in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12121243

Keywords

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; trimethylamine N-oxide; gut microbiota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease have increased levels of circulating trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), suggesting its important role in gut-liver interaction.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents an entity with an increasing prevalence which is characterized by significant hepatic and extrahepatic complications. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, with gut dysbiosis being considered a major determinant. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we tried to evaluate the association between the major gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and NAFLD. We performed a literature search for studies that determined circulating TMAO in patients with and without NAFLD. The database search identified 136 studies, and upon application of the exclusion criteria, 7 studies with 7583 individuals (NAFLD 2923, control 4660) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the control group, NAFLD patients had significantly higher circulating TMAO (SMD: 0.66, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.21, p = 0.02, I-2: 94%). The results remained unaffected after the exclusion of one influential study. The subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher TMAO in individuals with histologically proven NAFLD and in studies measuring TMAO with high-performance liquid chromatography. No differences were observed according to the study design or study region. However, funnel plot asymmetry was observed, indicating publication bias. In conclusion, patients with NAFLD had increased levels of TMAO, a hazardous gut microbial metabolite, suggesting its important role in the gut-liver interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available