4.6 Review

Different Types of Glucocorticoids to Evaluate Stress and Welfare in Animals and Humans: General Concepts and Examples of Combined Use

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13010106

Keywords

glucocorticoids; cortisol; cortisone; corticosterone; measurement; stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main glucocorticoids involved in the stress response, such as cortisol, cortisone, and corticosterone, are widely used as biomarkers for evaluating physiological response to stress. Measurement of total glucocorticoids, which encompasses various types of glucocorticoids, is commonly performed using immunoassays. This review explores the characteristics of these glucocorticoids, techniques for their quantification, and the importance of measuring multiple types of glucocorticoids in assessing welfare.
The main glucocorticoids involved in the stress response are cortisol and cortisone in most mammals and corticosterone in birds and rodents. Therefore, these analytes are currently the biomarkers more frequently used to evaluate the physiological response to a stressful situation. In addition, total glucocorticoids, which refers to the quantification of various glucocorticoids by immunoassays showing cross-reactivity with different types of glucocorticoids or related metabolites, can be measured. In this review, we describe the characteristics of the main glucocorticoids used to assess stress, as well as the main techniques and samples used for their quantification. In addition, we analyse the studies where at least two of the main glucocorticoids were measured in combination. Overall, this review points out the different behaviours of the main glucocorticoids, depending on the animal species and stressful stimuli, and shows the potential advantages that the measurement of at least two different glucocorticoid types can have for evaluating welfare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available