4.6 Review

Clinical Evidence of Low-Carbohydrate Diets against Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13020240

Keywords

obesity; low-carbohydrate diet; diabetes mellitus; healthy diet; weight control; glucose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research on low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) has shown their positive effects on obesity and diabetes, including reducing body mass index, body fat mass, and improving blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood glucose levels.
The popularity of low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) in the last few decades has motivated several research studies on their role in a variety of metabolic and non-morbid conditions. The available data of the results of these studies are put under the research perspective of the present literature review of clinical studies in search of the effects of LCDs on Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus. The electronic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. The literature search found seven studies that met the review's inclusion and exclusion criteria out of a total of 2637 studies. The included studies involved randomized controlled trials of at least 12 weeks' duration, in subjects with BMI >= 25 kg/m(2), with dietary interventions. The results of the study on the effects of LCDs on obesity showed their effectiveness in reducing Body Mass Index and total body fat mass. In addition, LCDs appear to cause drops in blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides, and seem to improve high-density lipoprotein (HDL) values. Regarding the effectiveness of LCDs in Diabetes Mellitus, their effect on reducing insulin resistance and fasting blood glucose and HbA1c values are supported. In conclusion, the results suggest the critical role of LCDs to improve the health of people affected by obesity or diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available