4.5 Article

Effects of Caffeine, a DNA Damage Response Inhibitor, on Papillomavirus Genome Replication

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11111298

Keywords

HPV; caffeine; replication

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute/NIH [R01CA058376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological studies have shown that caffeinated coffee can reduce the risk of oropharyngeal cancer caused by HPV. Caffeine inhibits the DNA damage response pathway, which affects the replication of HPV. Caffeine reduces the HPV copy number in the early stage of infection but increases the copy number of HPV episomes in later stages.
Epidemiological studies have revealed that caffeinated coffee imparts a reduced risk of oropharyngeal cancer, of which human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the causative agents. Caffeine is a known inhibitor of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. We sought to test the effects of caffeine on the early replication of the HPV31 virus. It has been reported that the inhibition of several factors necessary for the DDR during the differentiation-dependent stage of HPV block genome amplification, while the HPV genome maintenance replication was unaffected. We first studied the effects of caffeine in the earliest stages of viral infection. Using pseudo-virions (PsV) expressing an m-Cherry reporter gene and quasi-virions (QsV) containing HPV31 genomes to mediate the infection, we found no evidence that caffeine impeded the viral entry; however, the infected cells displayed a reduced HPV copy number. In contrast, caffeine exposure increased the copy number of HPV31 episomes in the transient transfection assays and in the CIN612E cells that stably maintain viral episomes. There was a concomitant increase in the steady state levels of the HPV31 E1 and E2 transcripts, along with increased E2 loading at the viral origin of replication (ori). These results suggest that the caffeine-mediated inhibition of the DDR reduces viral genome replication in the early stage of infection, in contrast to the maintenance stage, in which the inhibition of the DDR may lead to an increase in viral amplicon replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available