4.7 Article

Combined use of phase change material and thermal insulation to improve energy efficiency of residential buildings

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105880

Keywords

Phase change materials; PCM gypsum board; Energy efficiency; Thermal insulation; Life cycle analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper evaluates the use of phase change materials (PCM) and thermal insulation in the building envelope of a typical Australian house to promote energy efficiency and cost savings. The results demonstrate that this combination significantly improves the energy ratings and saves costs, depending on the climate zone. This indicates that employing PCM materials and thermal insulation in residential buildings is an effective way to enhance energy efficiency.
There is an increasing need to improve the energy efficiency of residential buildings all around the world. Providing thermal insulation to the external walls and ceilings is a common practice for this purpose. The combined use of phase change materials (PCM) and thermal insulation in building envelopes could potentially further promote the building energy efficiency while avoiding overheating. This is evaluated in this paper by combining the use of expanded polystyrene and PCM gypsum board in the building envelope of a typical standalone Australian house. The evaluation was conducted through numerical simulation by considering the location of the house in three different Australian cities (Darwin, Alice Springs, and Sydney), which represent three different climate zones (tropical savanna, hot semi-arid, and humid subtropical). The results show that in a life cycle of 10 years, the total cost savings from the optimal combination of PCM board and insulation in Darwin, Alice Springs and Sydney are AU$167.0, $162.3 and $39.7/m2, respectively. Meanwhile, the energy ratings of the house are increased by 3.5, 3.8 and 4.3 stars in the three cities, respectively. The payback periods of the renovation range between 2.2 and 7.5 years, depending on the climate conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available