4.6 Review

Addressing scale-up challenges and enhancement in performance of hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell through electrode modifications

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 2726-2746

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.198

Keywords

Microbial electrolysis cells; Electrode material; Scale-up; Hydrogen

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), South Korea - Korea government (MSIT) [2019R1A2C1006356, 2020R1C1C101317211]
  2. Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP12S-0304-190218]
  3. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ016259022021]
  4. [2021H1D3A2A02044903]
  5. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ016259022021] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review mainly focuses on the improvements and cheaper novel alternatives of electrode materials for bioelectrohydrogenesis using a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) to enhance its performance and overcome scale-up challenges.
Bioelectrohydrogenesis using a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) is a promising technology for simultaneous hydrogen production and wastewater treatment which uses electrogenic microbes. Microbial activity at the anode and hydrogen evolution reaction at the cathode can be controlled by electrode- microbe interaction and electron transfer. The selection of anode electrode material is governed by electrochemical oxidation of substrates and subsequent electron transfer to the anode. Similarly, a good cathodic material should reduce the overpotential at the cathode and enhance the hydrogen evolution reaction and H-2 recovery. This review mainly focused on modifications in electrode materials and cheaper novel alternatives to improve the performance for MEC and overcome its scale-up challenges for practical applications. Performance of various anode and cathode materials based on Ni alloys, stainless steel, polyaniline, palladium, and carbon has been discussed. The scalability of the material should consider its inexpensive fabrication procedure and efficiency. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available