4.6 Article

Presence of Free-living Acanthamoeba in Loa and Salado Rivers, Atacama Desert, Northern Chile

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10122315

Keywords

free-living amoebae; Acanthamoeba; Atacama Desert; Loa River; Salado River; Chiuchiu Pond; Tebenquiche; Salar de Atacama

Categories

Funding

  1. CONICYT CHILE
  2. [CeBiB FB-0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significant knowledge has been gained about the microbiome in the hyperarid Atacama Desert, but information on the Atacama free-living amoebae (FLA) is limited and more efforts are needed. The dominant presence of Acanthamoeba genus has been reported in water and sediment samples from the Loa and Salado rivers in northern Chile, indicating the need for further exploration of Atacama amoebae in other wetlands in the region.
Substantial knowledge has accumulated on the microbiome of the hyperarid Atacama Desert during the last two decades; however, information on Atacama free-living amoebae (FLA) is limited and increasing efforts are required. FLA are polyphyletic heterotrophic naked or testate protists that feed on organic matter, fungi, protozoa, and bacteria and may disseminate infections. Amoebae in Chile are represented by 416 taxa and 64 genera, and 29 taxa have been identified in arid shrub lands at the southern limit of the Atacama Desert, and Acanthamoeba are present in all the country's regions. To expand our knowledge and to contribute to the biogeographic distribution of Atacama FLA, we report the dominant presence of members of the genus Acanthamoeba in water and sediment sampled at the Loa and Salado rivers in the pre-Andean zone of the Antofagasta Region, northern Chile, at sites 2500 m above sea level. We expect these observations and preliminary evidence of FLA presence in other wetlands (Chiuchiu, Tebenquiche) in this region to be incentive for further exploration of Atacama amoebae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available