4.7 Article

Investigation of Adverse Events Experienced by Healthcare Workers following Immunization with Homologous or Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Vaccinations

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111869

Keywords

adverse events following immunization (AEFI); booster COVID-19 vaccination; homologous; heterologous

Funding

  1. Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects
  2. Qian Ke He Foundation [[2020] 4Y170]
  3. Doctor Foundation of Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
  4. Science and Technology Fund Projects of Guizhou Health Commission
  5. Special Science and Technology Projects of Guiyang Science and Technology Bureau
  6. Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Support Projects
  7. [gzwkj2023-210]
  8. [[2022]-4-1]
  9. [ZK [2022] General 253]
  10. [GZSYBS [2019] 02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative analysis was conducted to investigate the potential risk factors of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) after receiving different booster vaccines. The study found that doctors and women had a higher risk of adverse reactions, but overall, the rates of AEFI in all three booster groups were acceptable.
Objective: A comparative analysis was performed to investigate the potential risk factors of Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) after receiving different booster vaccines. Methods: From 18 January 2021 to 21 January 2022, the Health Care Workers (HCWs) of Guizhou Provincial Staff Hospital (Guizhou Province, China) who received a third Booster vaccine, that was either homologous (i.e., (i) a total of three doses of Vero cell vaccine or (ii) three doses of CHO cell vaccine) or (iii) heterologous with two first doses of Vero cell vaccine, being either CHO cell vaccine or adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vectored COVID-19 vaccine, were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire form to provide information on any AEFI that may have occurred in the first 3 days after vaccination with the booster. The frequency of AEFI corresponding to the three different booster vaccines was compared, and the risk factors for predicting AEFI were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 904 HCWs who completed the survey, 792 met the inclusion criteria. The rates of AEFI were 9.8% (62/635) in the homologous Vero cell booster group, 17.3% (13/75) in the homologous CHO cell booster group, and 20.7% (17/82) in the heterologous mixed vaccines booster group, and the rates were significantly different (chi(2) = 11.5, p = 0.004) between the three groups of vaccines. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that: (1) compared to the homologous Vero cell booster group, the risk of AEFI was about 2.1 times higher (OR = 2.095, 95% CI: 1.056-4.157, p = 0.034) in the CHO cell booster group and 2.5 times higher (OR = 2.476, 95% CI: 1.352-4.533, p = 0.003) in the mixed vaccines group; (2) the odds for women experiencing AEFI were about 2.8 times higher (OR = 2.792, 95% CI: 1.407-5.543, p = 0.003) than men; and (3) compared to the non-frontline HCWs, the risk of AEFI was about 2.6 times higher (OR = 2.648, 95% CI: 1.473-4.760, p = 0.001) in the doctors. Conclusion: The AEFI in all three booster groups are acceptable, and serious adverse events are rare. The risk of AEFI was higher in doctors, which may be related to the high stress during the COVID-19 epidemic. Support from government and non-governmental agencies is important for ensuring the physical and mental health of HCWs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available