Journal
VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010133
Keywords
vaccine hesitation; megastudies; RCTs; social factors; quality control; justice
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to global vaccine protection, necessitating evidence-based research for interventions. Current effectiveness evaluations are limited and do not compare different interventions. Megastudies, with their large-scale approach and uniform participant criteria, enable simultaneous evaluation of multiple interventions to identify the most effective ones. Furthermore, megastudies address the complexity of vaccine hesitancy by incorporating social factors in intervention design. Quality control and justice are crucial considerations for future megastudies.
Vaccine hesitancy is a considerable obstacle to achieving vaccine protection worldwide. There needs to be more evidence-based research for interventions for vaccine hesitancy. Existing effectiveness evaluations are limited to one particular hypothesis, and no studies have compared the effectiveness of different interventions. A megastudy takes a large-scale, multi-intervention, uniform participant and the same evaluation criteria approach to evaluate many interventions simultaneously and find the most effective ones. Therefore, megastudies can help us find the most effective interventions for vaccine hesitancy. Additionally, considering the complex causes of vaccine hesitancy, we design interventions that involve social factors in megastudies. Lastly, quality control and justice are critical issues for megastudies in the future.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available