4.7 Article

Immunogenicity and Safety of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in a Cohort of Patients with Hereditary Angioedema

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020215

Keywords

angioedema; hereditary angioedema; hereditary angioedema due to C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency; COVID-19; anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the benefits and potential risks of COVID-19 vaccination in hereditary angioedema (HAE) patients, focusing on the possibility of triggering attacks. The results show that although 16.1% of patients experienced attacks within 72 hours of the first dose, there was no significant change in attack frequency before and after vaccination. Furthermore, patients showed better disease control after vaccination, and all patients had a positive serological response to the vaccine without significant differences from healthy controls. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective for HAE patients.
Many factors may trigger hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks. This study aims to gain insights into the benefits and potential risks of COVID-19 vaccination in HAE patients, focusing particularly on the possibility of triggering attacks. We enrolled 31 patients with HAE undergoing two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Comirnaty-BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine. To evaluate the possible influence of the vaccine on disease control and attack frequency, we administered the angioedema control test (AECT) 4-week version before (T0), 21 days after the first dose (T1), and between 21 and 28 days after the second dose (T2). Despite 5 patients (16.1%) experiencing attacks within 72 h of the first dose administration, no significant variation in attack frequency was observed before and after vaccination [F(2,60) = 0.123; p = 0.799]. In addition, patients reported higher AECT scores at T1 and T2 compared to T0 [F(2,44) = 6.541; p < 0.05; post hoc p < 0.05)], indicating that the disease was rather more controlled after vaccinations than in the previous period. All patients showed a positive serological response to the vaccine without significant differences from healthy controls (U = 162; p = 0.062). These observations suggest that the vaccine administration is safe and effective in HAE patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available