4.7 Article

In vitro to in vivo acetaminophen hepatotoxicity extrapolation using classical schemes, pharmacodynamic models and a multiscale spatial-temporal liver twin

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1049564

Keywords

APAP; in vitro to in vivo extrapolation; acetaminophen; drug toxicity; digital twin; multi-scale; modeling; metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the author explores extrapolation strategies for acetaminophen (APAP) based on mechanistic models and compares different model types. The research shows that a classical homogeneous compartment model can accurately predict in vivo toxicity from in vitro data. However, a spatial-temporal multiscale model, which integrates more experimental information, requires adjustments to achieve the same prediction, suggesting the importance of spatial compartmentalization.
In vitro to in vivo extrapolation represents a critical challenge in toxicology. In this paper we explore extrapolation strategies for acetaminophen (APAP) based on mechanistic models, comparing classical (CL) homogeneous compartment pharmacodynamic (PD) models and a spatial-temporal (ST), multiscale digital twin model resolving liver microarchitecture at cellular resolution. The models integrate consensus detoxification reactions in each individual hepatocyte. We study the consequences of the two model types on the extrapolation and show in which cases these models perform better than the classical extrapolation strategy that is based either on the maximal drug concentration (Cmax) or the area under the pharmacokinetic curve (AUC) of the drug blood concentration. We find that an CL-model based on a well-mixed blood compartment is sufficient to correctly predict the in vivo toxicity from in vitro data. However, the ST-model that integrates more experimental information requires a change of at least one parameter to obtain the same prediction, indicating that spatial compartmentalization may indeed be an important factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available