Journal
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1079644
Keywords
mechanical properties; ceramic-based cement; computational models; impact; hip fracture
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Sideways falls causing femoral fractures are a major concern for the elderly, and current prevention methods are not very effective. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems involving ceramic-based bone cements are gaining attention as a potential alternative. This study evaluated the mechanical effectiveness of different bone cement injection patterns and found that supporting the femoral neck cortex is crucial in preventing fractures.
Femoral fractures due to sideways falls continue to be a major cause of concern for the elderly. Existing approaches for the prevention of these injuries have limited efficacy. Prophylactic femoral augmentation systems, particularly those involving the injection of ceramic-based bone cements, are gaining more attention as a potential alternative preventative approach. We evaluated the mechanical effectiveness of three variations of a bone cement injection pattern (basic ellipsoid, hollow ellipsoid, small ellipsoid) utilizing finite element simulations of sideways fall impacts. The basic augmentation pattern was tested with both high-and low-strength ceramic-based cements. The cement patterns were added to the finite element models (FEMs) of five cadaveric femurs, which were then subject to simulated sideways falls at seven impact velocities ranging from 1.0 m/s to 4.0 m/s. Peak impact forces and peak acetabular forces were examined, and failure was evaluated using a strain-based criterion. We found that the basic HA ellipsoid provided the highest increases in both the force at the acetabulum of the impacted femur (acetabular force, 55.0% +/- 22.0%) and at the force plate (impact force, 37.4% +/- 15.8%). Changing the cement to a weaker material, brushite, resulted in reduced strengthening of the femur (45.2% +/- 19.4% acetabular and 30.4% +/- 13.0% impact). Using a hollow version of the ellipsoid appeared to have no effect on the fracture outcome and only a minor effect on the other metrics (54.1% +/- 22.3% acetabular force increase and 35.3% +/- 16.0% impact force increase). However, when the outer two layers of the ellipsoid were removed (small ellipsoid), the force increases that were achieved were only 9.8% +/- 5.5% acetabular force and 8.2% +/- 4.1% impact force. These results demonstrate the importance of supporting the femoral neck cortex to prevent femoral fractures in a sideways fall, and provide plausible options for prophylactic femoral augmentation. As this is a preliminary study, the surgical technique, the possible effects of trabecular bone damage during the augmentation process, and the effect on the blood supply to the femoral head must be assessed further.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available