4.5 Article

Extraction and identification of mixed pesticides' Raman signal and establishment of their prediction models

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 494-500

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5049

Keywords

mixed pesticides; self-modeling mixture analysis; surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; Raman signal extraction; apple

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2016YFD0400905]
  2. National Key Technology RD Programs [2014BAD04B05-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nondestructive and sensitivemethod is developed to determinemixed pesticides of acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos and carbendazim in apple samples by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Self-modelingmixture analysis (SMA) was used to identify and extract the Raman signals of each pesticide from the spectra of apples contaminated with mixed pesticides. Results indicate that the obtained SERS signal intensities of each pesticide in their mixture have no obvious difference to the signal intensities of the corresponding pure pesticide at a low concentration. The lowest detectable level of acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos and carbendazim in apple are 0.0054mg/kg, 0.064mg/kg and 0.014mg/kg, respectively, which are sensitive enough for identifying apple contaminated with pesticides above the maximum residue limit. The predicted values of each pesticide in their mixture are obtained using the prediction model based on the Raman signal of the single pesticide. The correlation coefficients of predicted values and actual values are 0.893 for acetamiprid, 0.926 for chlorpyrifos and 0.938 for carbendazim, respectively. The method presents the ultrasensitive SERS performance for quantifying residual pesticides in apple samples without sample pretreatment, showing great potential to serve as a useful means for monitoring pesticide residues used in mixed state. Copyright (c) 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available