4.5 Article

Identification of waste cooking oil and vegetable oil via Raman spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 860-864

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.4895

Keywords

optical Raman scattering spectrum; partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); ratio method; waste cooking oil; identification

Categories

Funding

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20124401120005]
  2. Key Technologies R & D Program of Guangdong Province, China [2012A032300016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [S2011040001850]
  4. Guangdong College of Outstanding Youth Innovation Talent Training Project in China [LYM11026]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [21612436, 21612353]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper made a qualitative identification of ordinary vegetable oil and waste cooking oil based on Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectra of 73 samples of four varieties oil were acquired through the portable Raman spectrometer. Then, a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model and a discrimination model based on characteristic wave band ratio were established. A classification variable model of olive oil, peanut oil, corn oil and waste cooking oil that was established through the PLS-DA model could identify waste cooking oil accurately from vegetable oils. The identification model established based on selection of waveband characteristics and intensity ratio of different Raman spectrum characteristic peaks could distinguish vegetable oils from waste cooking oil accurately. Research results demonstrated that both ratio method and PLS-DA could identify waste cooking oil samples accurately. The identification model based on characteristic waveband ratio is simpler than PLS-DA model. It is widely applicable to identification of waste cooking oil. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available