4.8 Article

Scaling up anodic TiO2 nanotube layers - Influence of the nanotube layer thickness on the photocatalytic degradation of hexane and benzene

Journal

APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101567

Keywords

TiO2 nanotube layers; anodization; large areas; upscaling; gasphase photocatalysis

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [21- 27243S]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS CR) [LM 2018103, LM2018110]
  3. MEYS CR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work demonstrates the preparation of homogenous TiO2 nanotube (TNT) layers with different thicknesses on large area Ti substrates via anodization. The TNT layers were successfully employed as photocatalysts for the degradation of model compounds in the gas phase under ISO standards.
In this work, the preparation of homogenous TiO2 nanotube (TNT) layers with different thicknesses via anodization on Ti substrates with a large geometrical area of two times 5 cm x 10 cm (i.e. both sides of the Ti substrate) is shown for the first time. TNT layers with four different thicknesses of similar to 0.65 mu m, similar to 1 mu m, similar to 7 mu m, and similar to 14 mu m were prepared with excellent conformality and homogeneity over the anodized area. These TNT layers were successfully employed as photocatalysts for the degradation of hexane and benzene as model compounds in the gas phase under ISO standards, showing an increase of the conversion for both model compounds with the TNT layer thickness. While a stable hexane conversion was observed for all TNT layers during the measuring time of three hours, in case of benzene degradation an initial conversion decrease was monitored before the conversion stabilized. Despite this trend, SEM and XPS analyses did not reveal any significant amount of reaction products on the TNT layer surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available