4.5 Article

Validation of laser-induced thermal acoustics for chemically reacting H2/air free jets

Journal

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 47, Issue 9, Pages 1157-1166

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.4859

Keywords

laser-induced gratings; supersonic flow; combustion; free jet; hydrogen

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scramjet engine is a promising propulsion concept for future space transportation systems. To enhance the engine efficiency, a strong understanding of combustion mechanisms is essential. Laser-induced thermal acoustics (LITA) - a seedless, non-intrusive measurement technique - is an auspicious technique for the investigation of supersonic combustion. Here, we present two validation cases and first LITA measurements in a chemically reacting hydrogen/air free jet. The first validation case is the investigation of premixed methane/air and hydrogen/air flames, produced with a commercially available flat flame burner. The comparison with coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy measurements resulted in a deviation between the two measurement techniques smaller than the uncertainty of the techniques. The second validation case is the investigation of hot, supersonic air/air free jets at total temperatures of T-t=1050K and T-t=1300K. The comparison with computational fluid dynamics predictions shows a reasonable agreement with a maximum deviation of 13.9% for the free jet with a temperature of T-t=1300K and a good agreement with a maximum deviation of 4.4% for the free jet with a temperature of T-t=1050K. The LITA measurements in a chemically reacting hydrogen/air free jet showed a good reproduction of the flame position determined from an OH image. For the presented investigations, we used a homodyne, resonant LITA setup with a pulsed interrogation beam. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available