4.3 Article

Combined ab initio and experimental screening of phase stabilities in the Ce-Fe-Ti-X system (X=3d and 4d metals)

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.014410

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an ab initio based approach was used to modify the stability of Laves phases in the Ce-Fe-Ti system by adding 3d and 4d elements, resulting in improved thermodynamic stability. The critical annealing temperature for the formation of Ce(Fe,X)11Ti was determined using accurate free-energy calculations and efficient screening technique. Promising transition metals such as Zn and Tc were predicted to enhance the stability of the hard-magnetic phase. Comparison with other alloy experiments highlighted the importance of additional phases and quaternary elements.
One of the main challenges for the synthesis and application of the promising hard-magnetic compound CeFe11Ti is the formation of Laves phases that are detrimental for their thermodynamic stability and magnetic properties. In this paper, we present an ab initio based approach to modify the stability of these phases in the Ce-Fe-Ti system by additions of 3d and 4d elements. We combine highly accurate free-energy calculations with an efficient screening technique to determine the critical annealing temperature for the formation of Ce(Fe,X)11Ti. The central findings are the dominant role of the formation enthalpy at T = 0 K on chemical trends and the major relevance of partial chemical decompositions. Based on these insights, promising transition metals to promote the stability of the hard-magnetic phase, such as Zn and Tc, were predicted. The comparison with suction casting and reactive crucible melting experiments for Ce-Fe-Ti-X (X = Cu, Ga, Co, and Cr) highlights the relevance of additional phases and quaternary elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available