4.4 Article

Appropriate pore size for bone formation potential of porous collagen type I-based recombinant peptide

Journal

REGENERATIVE THERAPY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 294-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.08.001

Keywords

Bone reconstruction; Bone substitute; Calvaria; Recombinant human collagen peptide; Pore size; Interconnected pore

Funding

  1. FUJIFILM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, porous medium cross-linked recombinant collagen peptide (mRCP) with different pore sizes were developed and compared for bone regeneration in calvarial bone defects. The results show that the smaller pore size range of 100-300 mm is more suitable for mRCP in bone regeneration.
Introduction: In this study, we developed porous medium cross-linked recombinant collagen peptide (mRCP) with two different ranges of interconnected pore sizes, Small-mRCP (S-mRCP) with a range of 100-300 mm and Large-mRCP (L-mRCP) with a range of 200-500 mm, to compare the effect of pore size on bone regeneration in a calvarial bone defect. Methods: Calvarial bone defects were created in Sprague-Dawley rats through a surgical procedure. The rats were divided into 2 groups: S-mRCP implanted group and L-mRCP implanted group. The newly formed bone volume and bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) immediately after implantation and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after implantation. In addition, histological analyses were carried out with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining at 4 weeks after im-plantation to measure the newly formed bone area between each group in the entire defect, as well as the central side, the two peripheral sides (right and left), the periosteal (top) side and the dura matter (bottom) side of the defect. Results: Micro-CT analysis showed no significant differences in the amount of bone volume between the S-mRCP and L-mRCP implanted groups at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after implantation. BMD was equivalent to that of the adjacent native calvaria bone at 4 weeks after implantation. H & E images showed that the newly formed bone area in the entire defect was significantly larger in the S-mRCP implanted group than in the L-mRCP implanted group. Furthermore, the amount of newly formed bone area in all sides of the defect was significantly more in the S-mRCP implanted group than in the L-mRCP implanted group. Conclusion: These results indicate that the smaller pore size range of 100-300 mm is appropriate for mRCP in bone regeneration. (C) 2022, The Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available