Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Zona pellucida treatment before CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of porcine zygotes
Zhao Namula et al.
VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE (2022)
Effect of Aphidicolin, a Reversible Inhibitor of Eukaryotic Nuclear DNA Replication, on the Production of Genetically Modified Porcine Embryos by CRISPR/Cas9
Sergio Navarro-Serna et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES (2022)
Progressive genetic modifications of porcine cardiac xenografts extend survival to 9 months
Muhammad M. Mohiuddin et al.
XENOTRANSPLANTATION (2022)
Lipid-peptide nanocomplexes for mRNA delivery in vitro and in vivo
Dania Grant-Serroukh et al.
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE (2022)
Gene editing in porcine embryos using a combination of electroporation and transfection methods
Koki Takebayashi et al.
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS (2022)
Generation of Calpain-3 knock-out porcine embryos by CRISPR-Cas9 electroporation and intracytoplasmic microinjection of oocytes before insemination
Sergio Navarro-Serna et al.
THERIOGENOLOGY (2022)
Advances in pig models of human diseases
Naipeng Hou et al.
ANIMAL MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE (2022)
Generation of CD163-edited pig via electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into porcine in vitro-fertilized zygotes
Fuminori Tanihara et al.
ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY (2021)
Delivery of Protein Kinase A by CRISPRMAX and Its Effects on Breast Cancer Stem-Like Properties
Jun-Nian Zhou et al.
PHARMACEUTICS (2021)
Protocol for assessment of the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas RNP delivery to different types of target cells
Marina A. Tyumentseva et al.
PLOS ONE (2021)
Lipofection-Mediated Introduction of CRISPR/Cas9 System into Porcine Oocytes and Embryos
Maki Hirata et al.
ANIMALS (2021)
Generation of mutant pigs by lipofection-mediated genome editing in embryos
Maki Hirata et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)
Generation of Nonmosaic, Two-Pore Channel 2 Biallelic Knockout Figs in One veneration by CRISPR-Cas9 Microinjection Before Oocyte insemination
Sergio Navarro-Serna et al.
CRISPR JOURNAL (2021)
Timing and duration of lipofection-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery into porcine zygotes affect gene-editing events
Qingyi Lin et al.
BMC RESEARCH NOTES (2021)
Targeting of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli papG gene using CRISPR-dot nanocomplex reduced virulence of UPEC
Surbhi Gupta et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)
Improved CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in primary human myoblasts using low confluency cultures on Matrigel
Hayley Goullee et al.
SKELETAL MUSCLE (2021)
CRISPR/Cas9-mediatedMSTNdisruption accelerates the growth of Chinese Bama pigs
Xiang-Xing Zhu et al.
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS (2020)
CD163 and pAPN double-knockout pigs are resistant to PRRSV and TGEV and exhibit decreased susceptibility to PDCoV while maintaining normal production performance
Kui Xu et al.
ELIFE (2020)
A porcine model of phenylketonuria generated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
Erik A. Koppes et al.
JCI INSIGHT (2020)
Highly Efficient Generation of Pigs Harboring a Partial Deletion of the CD163 SRCR5 Domain, Which Are Fully Resistant to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 Infection
Chunhe Guo et al.
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY (2019)
Deletion of CD163 Exon 7 Confers Resistance to Highly Pathogenic Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Viruses on Pigs
Haitao Wang et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2019)
CD163 knockout pigs are fully resistant to highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Huaqiang Yang et al.
ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH (2018)
Quadrupling efficiency in production of genetically modified pigs through improved oocyte maturation
Ye Yuan et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2017)
Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function
Christine Burkard et al.
PLOS PATHOGENS (2017)
DNA methylation and gene expression changes derived from assisted reproductive technologies can be decreased by reproductive fluids
Sebastian Canovas et al.
ELIFE (2017)
Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Kristin M. Whitworth et al.
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY (2016)
Improved delivery of Cas9 protein/gRNA complexes using lipofectamine CRISPRMAX
Xin Yu et al.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS (2016)
Breaking-Cas-interactive design of guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas experiments for ENSEMBL genomes
Juan C. Oliveros et al.
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH (2016)
High-throughput genotyping of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutants using fluorescent PCR-capillary gel electrophoresis
Muhammad Khairul Ramlee et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2015)
Osteogenic and neurogenic differentiation of EGFP gene transfected neural stem cells derived from the brain of porcine fetuses at intermediate and late gestational age
Yue-Mao Zheng et al.
CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL (2010)
Characteristics and EGFP expression of porcine mammary gland epithelial cells
Yue-Mao Zheng et al.
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE (2010)
New Insights into the Mechanisms of Fertilization: Comparison of the Fertilization Steps, Composition, and Structure of the Zona Pellucida Between Horses and Pigs
Sylvie Mugnier et al.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION (2009)
Reduced Immunolabelling of a Porcine Oocyte Membrane Protein Reflects Reduced Fertilizability of Porcine Oocytes Following Elevated Ambient Temperature
T. Berger et al.
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS (2009)
Development of porcine transgenic nuclear-transferred embryos derived from fibroblast cells transfected by the novel technique of nucleofection or standard lipofection
M. Skrzyszowska et al.
THERIOGENOLOGY (2008)
Efficient Transfection of primarily cultured porcine embryonic fibroblasts using the Amaxa nucleofection system™
Asuka Nakayama et al.
CLONING AND STEM CELLS (2007)
CD163 expression confers susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses
Jay G. Calvert et al.
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY (2007)
Evaluation of RNA interference in developing porcine granulosa cells using fluorescence reporter genes
T Hirano et al.
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (2004)