4.7 Article

Pathogenicity and Transmissibility of Clade 2.3.4.4h H5N6 Avian Influenza Viruses in Mammals

Journal

ANIMALS
Volume 12, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani12223079

Keywords

chickens; avian influenza; pathogenicity; transmissibility

Funding

  1. Key Research Projects in Hebei Province [18227517D]
  2. Hebei Industrial Technology System [HBCT2018150210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past decade, the global attention towards the spread of H5N6 avian influenza viruses (AIVs) in birds and their infection in humans has increased. These viruses have the potential to become a worldwide health pandemic. This study focused on two strains of H5N6 AIVs, HB1907 and HB1905, isolated from chickens in Hebei, China in 2019. Both strains were categorized in the 2.3.4.4h clade and exhibited highly pathogenic characteristics. The HB1905 strain showed a preference for avian-like receptors, while the HB1907 strain bound to both avian-like and human-like receptors. The HB1907 strain demonstrated better replication ability and higher pathogenicity in mice compared to the HB1905 strain. Additionally, the transmission efficiency of the HB1907 strain through direct contact between guinea pigs was higher than that of the HB1905 strain. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance and research on H5N6 AIVs for public health safety and the sustainable development of the livestock industry.
Simple Summary In the past decade, the spread of H5N6 avian influenza viruses (AIVs) in birds and infection in humans has attracted increasing global attention, and these viruses have the potential to become a pandemic threat to global health. In this study, the HA genes of the HB1907 and HB1905 AIVs were clustered in the 2.3.4.4h clade, and the HA genes of both strains exhibited highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) characteristics. The HB1905 strain in this study has a binding preference for avian-like (alpha-2,3) receptors only, whereas the HB1907 strain has a binding preference for both avian-like (alpha-2,3) and human-like (alpha-2,6) receptors. Compared with the HB1905 strain, the HB1907 strain showed better replication ability in MDCK cells in the early stage of infection. At the same time, the HB1907 strain showed advantages in the pathogenicity of mice and the transmission ability of direct contact between guinea pigs. These results further suggest that epidemiological surveillance and the related studies of H5N6 AIVs are essential for public health safety and the healthy and sustainable development of the livestock industry. Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) have the potential for cross-species transmission and pandemics. In recent years, clade 2.3.4.4 H5N6 AIVs are prevalent in domestic poultry, posing a threat to the domestic poultry industry and public health. In this study, two strains of H5N6 AIVs were isolated from chickens in Hebei, China, in 2019: A/chicken/Hebei/HB1907/2019(H5N6) and A/chicken/Hebei/HB1905/2019(H5N6). Phylogenetic analysis showed that both viral HA genes clustered in the 2.3.4.4h clade. Receptor binding analysis showed that the HB1905 strain preferentially binds to alpha-2,3-linked sialic acid (SA) receptors, while the HB1907 strain preferentially binds to alpha-2,3- and alpha-2,6-linked sialic acid (SA) receptors. During early infection, the HB1907 strain is highly replicable in MDCK cells, more so than the HB1905 strain. Pathogenicity assays in mice showed that both viruses could replicate in the lungs without prior adaptation, with HB1907 being more highly pathogenic in mice than the HB1905 strain. Significantly, both the HB1905 and HB1907 strains can be transmitted through direct contact among guinea pigs, but the transmission efficiency of the HB1907 strain through contact between guinea pigs is much greater than that of the HB1905 strain. These results strengthen the need for ongoing surveillance and early warning of H5N6 AIVs in poultry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available