4.5 Article

Role of space station instruments for improving tropical carbon flux estimates using atmospheric data

Journal

NPJ MICROGRAVITY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41526-022-00231-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK National Centre for Earth Observation - National Environment Research Council [NE/R016518/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing a ground-based atmospheric measurement network in the tropics is challenging, but the International Space Station (ISS) and its successors offer opportunities to host new Earth-observing atmospheric sensors, leading to a better understanding of tropical carbon fluxes.
The tropics is the nexus for many of the remaining gaps in our knowledge of environmental science, including the carbon cycle and atmospheric chemistry, with dire consequences for our ability to describe the Earth system response to a warming world. Difficulties associated with accessibility, coordinated funding models and economic instabilities preclude the establishment of a dense pan-tropical ground-based atmospheric measurement network that would otherwise help to describe the evolving state of tropical ecosystems and the associated biosphere-atmosphere fluxes on decadal timescales. The growing number of relevant sensors aboard sun-synchronous polar orbiters provide invaluable information over the remote tropics, but a large fraction of the data collected along their orbits is from higher latitudes. The International Space Station (ISS), which is in a low-inclination, precessing orbit, has already demonstrated value as a proving ground for Earth observing atmospheric sensors and as a testbed for new technology. Because low-inclination orbits spend more time collecting data over the tropics, we argue that the ISS and its successors, offer key opportunities to host new Earth-observing atmospheric sensors that can lead to a step change in our understanding of tropical carbon fluxes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available