4.6 Article

Analysis of Fluid Flow in a Radial Centrifugal Pump

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020448

Keywords

Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV); ANSYS; centrifugal pump; performance characteristic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper validates a numerical model of radial centrifugal pump flow using the PIV experimental method. A 3D model of the pump was created in Inventor and a numerical flow model was designed in Ansys CFX. The performance characteristics of the pump were measured on an experimental test circuit, and compared with the vector maps obtained through PIV to evaluate the consistency of the numerical model. The results showed that the model is most accurate when the input variables are the pressure in front of the pump and the mass flow behind the pump, with a deviation of 1% to 10% and creation of corresponding streamlines in the suction pipe.
The paper presents a validation of the results of a numerical model of radial centrifugal pump flow using a PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) experimental method. For this purpose, a 3D model of the pump was created in Inventor, which was then used to design a numerical flow model in Ansys in the CFX module. The performance characteristics of the same pump were measured on an experimental test circuit, and vector maps of the flow in the suction pipe were obtained using the PIV method. The results of the experiment-vector fields of fluid velocity distribution in a suction pipe-were then compared with the outputs of the numerical Ansys model, namely the streamlines and pressure distributions. This comparison demonstrated that the numerical model is most consistent with reality if the input variables are the pressure in front of the pump and the mass flow behind the pump. In this case, the model can determine the pressure at the pump inlet with a deviation of 1% to 10% and create streamlines in the suction pipe corresponding to the results of PIV measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available