4.6 Review

Lithium in a Sustainable Circular Economy: A Comprehensive Review

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020418

Keywords

lithium; lithium recovery; chemical precipitation; circular economy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium is a vital raw material used for various applications, and its demand is increasing due to electrification and decarbonization efforts. The current supply from brines and hard rock ores is insufficient, thus alternative resources and efficient techniques are needed. Chemical precipitation is considered the most efficient technology for lithium extraction from wastewater. This paper reviews the technology, challenges, environmental impacts, and alternative approaches for lithium recovery via chemical precipitation.
Lithium is a vital raw material used for a wide range of applications, such as the fabrication of glass, ceramics, pharmaceuticals, and batteries for electric cars. The accelerating electrification transition and the global commitment to decarbonization have caused an increasing demand for lithium. The current supply derived from brines and hard rock ores is not enough to meet the global demand unless alternate resources and efficient techniques to recover this valuable metal are implemented. In the past few decades, several approaches have been studied to extract lithium from aqueous resources. Among those studied, chemical precipitation is considered the most efficient technology for the extraction of metals from wastewater. This paper outlines the current technology, its challenges, and its environmental impacts. Moreover, it reviews alternative approaches to recover lithium via chemical precipitation, and systematically studies the effects of different operating conditions on the lithium precipitation rate. In addition, the biggest challenges of the most recent studies are discussed, along with implications for future innovation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available