4.6 Article

Optimization and Prediction of Stability of Emulsified Liquid Membrane (ELM): Artificial Neural Network

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020364

Keywords

emulsified liquid membrane (ELM); stability; Span 80; stirring speed; emulsification time; artificial neural network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the emulsified liquid membrane (ELM) extraction process was optimized to improve emulsion stability, and a neural network model was used to predict the leakage of the inner phase. The results showed that the membrane rupture rate could be minimized by controlling the surfactant concentration, emulsification time, and stirring speed. The neural network model exhibited high statistical coefficients and minimal statistical errors in predicting the inner phase leakage.
In this work, the emulsified liquid membrane (ELM) extraction process was studied as a technique for separating different pollutants from an aqueous solution. The emulsified liquid membrane used consisted of Sorbitan mono-oleate (Span 80) as a surfactant with n-hexane (C6H14) as a diluent; the internal phase used was nitric acid (HNO3). The major constraint in the implementation of the extraction process by an emulsified liquid membrane (ELM) is the stability of the emulsion. However, this study focused first on controlling the stability of the emulsion by optimizing many operational factors, which have a direct impact on the stability of the membrane. Among the important parameters that cause membrane breakage, the surfactant concentration, the emulsification time, and the stirring speed were demonstrated. The optimization results obtained showed that the rupture rate (Tr) decreased until reaching a minimum value of 0.07% at 2% of weight/weight of Span 80 concentration with an emulsification time of 3 min and a stirring speed of 250 rpm. On the other hand, the volume of the inner phase leaking into the outer phase was predicted using an artificial neural network (ANN). The evaluation criteria of the ANN model in terms of statistical coefficient and RMSE error revealed very interesting results and the performance of the model since the statistical coefficients were very high and close to 1 in the four phases (R_training = 0.99724; R_validation = 0.99802; R_test = 0.99852; R_all data = 0.99772), and also, statistical errors of RMSE were minimal (RMSE_training= 0.0378; RMSE_validation = 0.0420; RMSE_test = 0.0509; RMSE_all data = 0.0406).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available