4.6 Article

Carbon Capture from Post-Combustion Flue Gas Using a State-Of-The-Art, Anti-Sublimation, Solid-Vapor Separation Unit

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10112406

Keywords

carbon capture; cryogenic CO2 separation; solid phase formation; solid-liquid-vapor equilibrium; freezing prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work addresses the challenge of removing carbon dioxide from flue gas streams through the development of a novel solid-vapor (SV) CO2 capture/separation unit. Compared to the conventional amine-scrubbing technology, the SV unit consumes less energy, requires fewer capital equipment, and avoids the use of additional agents.
This work attempts to address the quest of removing carbon dioxide from flue gas streams to help preserve the environment. It is based on a model that is able to describe the solid-liquid-vapour and solid-vapour phase equilibria for the ternary system of N-2-O-2-CO2 at pressures from 5 to 130 bar and over a wide range of temperature (140 to 220 K). Furthermore, a corresponding state-of-the art solid-vapor (SV) CO2 capture/separation unit is developed and introduced in this work. The SV unit was modeled using the Aspen Custom Modeler software by implementing the thermodynamic model developed before. It was then simulated using the Aspen Plus simulator; its performance was studied and analyzed. Moreover, the performance of the unit was optimized and compared to the most conventional corresponding technology used by the industry (i.e., amine-scrubbing). Results proved that for the same output clean gas composition, which contains only 0.3% CO2, the developed state-of-the-art SV unit consumes almost half of the energy required by the conventional process. Other advantages of the novel SV separation unit include the lower requirement of capital equipment, no need of additional agents (such as solvents) and the avoidance of product contamination with such additional agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available