4.6 Article

Optimization of Heat Recovery Networks for Energy Savings in Industrial Processes

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11020321

Keywords

energy conservation; heat integration; heat exchanger network synthesis; retrofit; mathematical programming; superstructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy efficiency plays a crucial role in decarbonizing the global energy system by reducing energy consumption in various sectors. In the industrial processes, improving energy efficiency can be achieved through heat recovery via heat exchange. This study develops a mathematical programming model for optimizing heat exchanger networks, taking into account the phase change of process streams. The model is applied to a case study of an ethylene glycol production plant, demonstrating the compromise between steam savings and process feasibility.
Among the pillars of decarbonization of the global energy system, energy efficiency plays a key role in reducing energy consumption across end-use (industry, transport and buildings) sectors. In industrial processes, energy efficiency can be improved by exploiting heat recovery via heat exchange between process streams. This paper develops a stage-wise superstructure-based mathematical programming model for the optimization of heat exchanger networks. The model incorporates rigorous formulation to handle process streams with phase change (condensation or evaporation), and is applied to a case study of an ethylene glycol production plant in Taiwan for minimizing utility consumption. The results show a compromise between steam savings and process feasibility, as well as how the model is modified to reflect practical considerations. In the preliminary analysis, with a substantial potential steam saving of 15,476 kW (28%), the solution involves forbidden matches that pose a hazard to the process and cannot be implemented. In the further analysis without process streams that cause forbidden matches, although the space limitation in the plant renders the best solution infeasible, the compromise solution can achieve a considerable steam saving of up to 8448 kW (91%) and is being evaluated by the plant managers and operators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available