4.6 Article

Streptococcus pyogenes vaccine candidates do not induce autoimmune responses in a rheumatic heart disease model

Journal

NPJ VACCINES
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00604-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed a candidate vaccine containing two synthetic peptides derived from Streptococcus pyogenes proteins to protect against multiple strains of infections. In a rat autoimmune valvulitis model, we found that the vaccine candidate antigens did not induce autoimmune complications and inflammatory pathology. The study provides preclinical evidence of the safety and suitability of the vaccine candidates for human clinical trials.
We have developed a candidate vaccine to protect against multiple strains of Streptococcus pyogenes infections. The candidate vaccine contains two synthetic peptides derived from S. pyogenes proteins: the M-protein epitope, p*17 and the IL-8 degrading S. pyogenes Cell-Envelope Proteinase (SpyCEP) epitope, K4S2. In this study we utilise a rat autoimmune valvulitis model that displays both the cardiac and neurobehavioural pathology associated with post-streptococcal sequelae, to assess if the vaccine candidate antigens induce autoimmune complications and inflammatory pathology. Each antigen was conjugated to carrier protein diphtheria toxoid (DT) and independently assessed for potential to induce autoimmune pathology in female Lewis rats. Rats were administered three subcutaneous doses, and one intranasal dose over a four-week study with a two-week recovery period. A positive control group received recombinant S. pyogenes M5 (rM5) protein, and the negative control group received PBS. Rats that received rM5 developed significant cardiac and neurological pathologies. There was no evidence of these pathologies in the PBS control group, or the rats administered either P*17-DT or K4S2-DT. This study provides further preclinical evidence of the safety of the vaccine candidates p*17 and K4S2 and their appropriateness as candidates in human clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available